Third Order on Reconsideration: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Undo revision 782 by Michi (talk)
Tags: Reverted Visual edit
(Undo revision 782 by Michi (talk))
Tag: Undo
 
Line 14: Line 14:
In the Third Report and Order discussed above, the Commission established a going-forward limit of ten pending short-form applications per applicant from FM translator Auction No. 83, and directed the Bureau to resume processing the applications of those applicants in compliance with this numerical cap.
In the Third Report and Order discussed above, the Commission established a going-forward limit of ten pending short-form applications per applicant from FM translator Auction No. 83, and directed the Bureau to resume processing the applications of those applicants in compliance with this numerical cap.


Petitions for reconsideration opposing the cap were filed by [[Wikipedia:CSN International|CSN International]], [[Wikipedia:National Religious Broadcasters|National Religious Broadcasters]], Positive Alternative Radio, Inc., and [[Wikipedia:Educational Media Foundation|Educational Media Foundation]] et. al.  In light of our adoption of the market-specific translator application dismissal process described in [the] ''Fourth Report and Order'', were dismsised as as moot.
Petitions for reconsideration opposing the cap were filed by [[Wikipedia:CSN International|CSN International]], [[Wikipedia:National Religious Broadcasters|National Religious Broadcasters]], Positive Alternative Radio, Inc., and [[Wikipedia:Educational Media Foundation|Educational Media Foundation]] et. al.  In light of our adoption of the market-specific translator application dismissal process described in [the] ''Fourth Report and Order'', we dismiss them as moot.


== Related links ==
== Related links ==

Navigation menu