379
edits
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (view source)
Revision as of 21:39, 9 August 2022
, 2 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Issued together with the ''Second Order on Reconsideration,'' this ''Notice of Proposed Rulemaking'' is mainly the byproduct of various ''ex parte'' meetings, filings and of a forum hosted by the FCC on February 8, 2005. This forum was intended to inform the FCC of achievements by LPFM stations and the challenges faced as the service marks its fifth year. {{Proceeding | |||
|type = Notice of Proposed Rulemaking | |type = Notice of Proposed Rulemaking | ||
|name = Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking | |name = Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
=== Transferability === | === Transferability === | ||
==== Background ==== | |||
When the FCC established the LPFM service, they originally determined that in order to implement the service quickly and in a manner free of speculation that there would be a prohibition on the assignments and transfers with the exception of involuntary transfers of control (for example, when someone dies) or when there is less than a substantial change in control. | |||
Based on forum testimony and ''ex parte'' presentations and previous waiver requests, the FCC now has the position that the ban on assignments and transfers are unduly restrictive and may hinder, rather than promote the LPFM service. Therefore the FCC inquires whether to authorize assignments and transfers in the LPFM service and whether such assignments and transfers should be limited to special circumstances. | |||
==== Transfers of control within the same organization ==== | |||
The FCC wanted to know if such transfers should require any restrictions beyond assuring that the license entity still meets LPFM eligibility criteria. The FCC wanted to know the types of organizational structures utilized by LPFM licensees and how transfers of control, if permitted would be effectuated. The FCC wishes more information on whether and how to amend the rules to permit a transfer of control of an LPFM licensee in the case of a sudden change in the majority of a governing board. The FCC proposes to amend the rules to permit changes of more than 50 percent of the membership of the governing boards that occur suddenly, in addition to the gradual board changes that are currently permitted under the rules. | |||
==== Assignments of licenses to other organizations ==== | |||
The FCC requested comments on whether they should amend the rules to permit the assignment of LPFM authorizations to another entity. What consideration should be allowed? Should the FCC permit the sale of LPFM stations? The FCC asked if there should be a holding period in which the station may not be sold at all or whether the station should or should not be sold for more than the licensee's legitimate and prudent expenses. What procedures should be implemented to ensure the integrity of the process and the promotion of local service? | |||
==== Interim waiver authorized ==== | |||
In the interim, the Commission has delegated to the Media Bureau the authority to consider, on a case-by case basis, requests for waivers of §73.865 in order to permit transfers in cases where the public interest would be served such as a change in a majority of the governing board with no change in the organization's mission; development of a partnership or cooperate effort between local community groups, of which one is the licensee; and to transfer to another local entity upon the inability of the current licensee to maintain operations. Cases where the LPFM station is being sold for a profit, transferred to a non-local entity or to another entity that already owns another LPFM station would not be grounds for a waiver. | |||
=== Ownership and eligibility limitations === | === Ownership and eligibility limitations === | ||
In the original rules, the FCC allowed for entities to own up to 5 LPFM stations after 2 years of the service and up to 10 stations after 3 years. Despite this, the Original Filing Window Series was limited to only local applicants. The United Church of Christ, Office for Communication (UCC) has requested that the FCC permanently prohibits multiple ownership and either permanently restrict the service to only local entities or extend the "locals only" restrictions for an additional period of time. | |||
Now that two years as passed since the Original Filing Window Series, the FCC questions whether they should amend the rules to reinstate the locals only rule for a longer period of time or to make the restriction permanent. Would a continued limitation on multiple ownership foster diversity of programming or viewpoint or would it prevent LPFM licensees from achieving economies of scale? Does an eligibility for entities assure local service for listeners or night it result in some communities losing LPFM service because no local entity seeks to provide it? | |||
=== Time-sharing === | === Time-sharing === | ||
In the original rules, the FCC set up a 30 day settlement period in which applicants that are mutually exclusive can attempt to reach a time sharing settlement agreement. Media Access Project stated that because LPFM stations have minimal resources, 30 days is too short. MAP had requested the deadline be 90 days instead. The FCC proposes a 90 day period instead of 30. | |||
The FCC also proposed expectancy of renewal for viable involuntary time share agreements. In the past, such arrangements were not renewable. | |||
== Technical Rules == | == Technical Rules == | ||