Regulatory History of LPFM: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 63: Line 63:
|-
|-
|99-25
|99-25
|''Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking''
|''[[Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking]]''
|Mar. 17, 2005
|Mar. 17, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|Proposes to allow assignments and transfers of control, impose an ownership cap of 1 station for educational licensees, impose a localism requirement, extend the construction period to 36 months, allow time share applicants to minor modify to a common location even if over 5.6 km, examine the issue of preclusion from the Auction 83 FM translator window and examine ways to address potential LPFM displacement by modification and drop-ins of full-service FM facilities.
|-
|-
|99-25
|99-25
|''Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking''
|''[[Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking]]''
|Dec. 11, 2007
|Dec. 11, 2007
|
|
Line 141: Line 141:
|Mar. 17, 2005
|Mar. 17, 2005
|
|
|
|Extended the move distance allowed on minor modifications.
|-
|-
|99-25
|99-25
Line 148: Line 148:
|Dec. 11, 2007
|Dec. 11, 2007
|
|
|
|Permits assignments of licenses after 3 years of operation, permits transfers of control including sudden board changes, imposed a limit of 1 LPFM station on educational licensees, imposed a localism requirement for licensees, new renewal expectancy for involuntary time share licensees that reach a universal agreement, allows requests to extend the construction period from 18 to 36 months, allows minor amendments beyond 5.6/3.5 km to allow for common time-share transmitter sites, imposes a cap of 10 applications on Auction 83 FM translator applications, eliminates §73.809 interference remediation requirements for subsequent full-service moves on second or third adjacent channels, allows LPFM stations displaced by full-service modifications to seek second-adjacent waivers on alternate channels and blocks certain full-service modifications if it will result in an LPFM displacement where the LPFM is unable to move to an alternate channel.
|-
|-
|99-25
|99-25